The complete enterprise architecture blueprint for deploying production-grade LLM and agentic AI systems on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. Six architectural planes, OCI service mapping, and the decision framework that gets you from demo to deployment.

TL;DR: Most GenAI initiatives stall because teams build the model layer and neglect the other five planes that make production possible. This blueprint maps enterprise architecture requirements to OCI services across six planes—from identity to observability—giving you the complete stack that survives compliance reviews and 3 AM incidents.
Every enterprise I work with has built an LLM demo in a week.
Most are still running that same demo six months later.
The bottleneck isn't the model. It's everything around it:
The LLM is a dependency. The system is a product.
This framework organizes production GenAI systems into six architectural planes. Each plane has:
Responsibility: User-facing interfaces that consume AI capabilities
Key Characteristics:
OCI Service Mapping:
| Component | OCI Service | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Web/Mobile UI | OCI APEX | Custom React/Next.js on OKE |
| Chat Interface | Digital Assistant | Custom chat on OCI Functions |
| Admin Console | OCI Console Extensions | Custom dashboard |
| API Consumers | Any client via REST | SDK-based integration |
Architecture Decision: APEX vs. Custom
Responsibility: Security boundary, traffic management, tenant governance
Why This Plane Fails First:
OCI Service Mapping:
| Component | OCI Service | Configuration |
|---|---|---|
| Edge Protection | OCI WAF | Rate limiting, geo-blocking, bot mitigation |
| API Management | OCI API Gateway | AuthN/Z, request transformation, throttling |
| Identity | OCI IAM + Identity Domains | OIDC, SAML, MFA enforcement |
| Secrets | OCI Vault | API keys, model credentials, encryption keys |
| DNS & CDN | OCI DNS + Edge Services | Global routing, caching static assets |
Reference Architecture: Multi-Tenant API Layer
Critical Controls:
| Control | Implementation | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Per-Tenant Token Budget | API Gateway + Logging Analytics | Prevents one tenant from consuming all model capacity |
| Request Signing | OCI Vault + API Gateway | Prevents replay attacks and request tampering |
| Prompt Injection Detection | WAF Rules + Custom Functions | First line of defense against adversarial inputs |
Responsibility: Agent runtime, workflow control, state management, tool routing
The Core Decision: Managed Agents vs. Framework Agents
OCI Service Mapping:
| Component | Managed (Agent Platform) | Framework (LangGraph) |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime | OCI AI Agent Platform | OKE + Container Instances |
| State | Built-in | Redis on OCI / Autonomous JSON |
| Memory | Built-in sessions | Custom implementation |
| Tools | Pre-built connectors | MCP servers on Cloud Run |
| Scaling | Automatic | HPA + KEDA |
Orchestration Patterns on OCI (Detailed in Part 2):
| Pattern | OCI Implementation | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential | Agent Platform workflow | Document processing pipeline |
| Concurrent | OKE parallel pods | Multi-perspective analysis |
| Handoff | Agent-to-agent routing | Customer service escalation |
| Orchestrator-Worker | Parent agent + child agents | Complex research tasks |
| Human-in-Loop | APEX approval UI + agent | High-stakes decisions |
Responsibility: Knowledge access, vector search, structured data, document processing
Oracle's Differentiator: Native Vector Search in Oracle Database 23ai
Unlike bolt-on vector stores, Oracle Database 23ai provides:
VECTOR_DISTANCE() in standard SQL queriesOCI Service Mapping:
| Component | OCI Service | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Document Storage | Object Storage | None needed |
| Processing | OCI Data Integration / Functions | Custom on OKE |
| Embedding | OCI Generative AI (Cohere Embed) | Self-hosted models |
| Vector Store | Oracle Database 23ai | OpenSearch (if multi-cloud) |
| Structured Data | Autonomous Database | MySQL HeatWave |
| Graph Data | Oracle Property Graph (23ai) | None comparable |
The Select AI Pattern (Zero-Hallucination SQL):
-- Natural language query translated to SQL
SELECT AI 'Show me top 10 customers by revenue this quarter'
FROM customers, orders
WHERE order_date >= '2026-01-01';
-- Model generates SQL, executes against actual data
-- No hallucination possible: result is from real database
Responsibility: LLM endpoints, model selection, fine-tuning, inference optimization
OCI Generative AI: Model-Agnostic Enterprise AI
Enterprise Security Controls:
| Control | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Data Residency | Sovereign Cloud regions (UK, EU, US Gov) |
| Network Isolation | Private endpoints, no public internet |
| Encryption | Customer-managed keys (OCI Vault) |
| Access Control | Fine-grained IAM policies per model |
| Audit | All API calls logged to Logging Analytics |
Responsibility: Observability, evaluation, CI/CD, audit, lifecycle management
Why This Plane Is Non-Negotiable:
OCI Service Mapping:
| Component | OCI Service | Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Logging | OCI Logging + Logging Analytics | Ingest all agent/model traffic |
| Tracing | OCI APM | OpenTelemetry instrumentation |
| Metrics | OCI Monitoring | Custom metrics + dashboards |
| Alerting | OCI Notifications | Slack, PagerDuty, email |
| Audit | OCI Audit | Immutable compliance records |
| CI/CD | OCI DevOps | Model deployment pipelines |
One-Page Reference: All Six Planes
| Decision Factor | Choose OCI When | Consider Alternatives When |
|---|---|---|
| Data residency | Sovereign Cloud regions required | Global-only workloads OK |
| Database integration | Oracle DB is source of truth | Greenfield with no Oracle |
| Model flexibility | Need multi-provider models | Committed to single vendor |
| Enterprise security | Strict compliance (HIPAA, FedRAMP) | Startup-scale security OK |
| Cost predictability | Dedicated AI clusters preferred | Variable pay-per-token OK |
Part 2: Agent Orchestration Patterns — Six orchestration patterns mapped to OCI services, with decision criteria for each.
Part 3: The Operating Model — Evaluation pipelines, CI/CD for AI, incident response, and the maturity roadmap.
Q: What's the minimum viable production architecture on OCI?
VCN with private subnets + OCI WAF + API Gateway + OCI AI Agent Platform (or OKE running LangGraph) + OCI Generative AI hosted models + Autonomous Database 23ai + Logging Analytics + APM.
Q: How does OCI compare to AWS Bedrock or Azure OpenAI?
OCI differentiates on: (1) native database integration with 23ai vector search, (2) model-agnostic multi-provider approach, (3) sovereign cloud regions for strict data residency, (4) dedicated AI clusters for isolation and predictable costs.
Q: Can I use open-source frameworks like LangGraph on OCI?
Yes. Deploy LangGraph on OKE, use OCI Generative AI as the model provider, and OCI services for all surrounding infrastructure. Part 2 details this pattern.
Q: What about cost management for unpredictable agent workloads?
Implement per-tenant token budgets at the API Gateway, use dedicated AI clusters for predictable costs, and set up cost alerts in OCI Cost Management. Part 3 covers operational cost controls.
This is Part 1 of a 3-part series on production LLM and agentic AI systems on OCI.
Sources:
Read on FrankX.AI — AI Architecture, Music & Creator Intelligence
Join 1,000+ creators and architects receiving weekly field notes on AI systems, production patterns, and builder strategy.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.