Skip to content
Research Hub/Frontier AI Models & Generative Intelligence

Frontier AI Models & Generative Intelligence

Benchmarks, pricing, capabilities, and what to use when

TL;DR

Claude Opus 4.6 leads ARC-AGI-2 (68.8%) and Terminal-Bench (65.4%) as of February 2026. Its 67% price cut to $5/$25 makes it competitive with mid-tier models. Grok 4.1 and Gemini 3 Pro lead on context (2M). The market is splitting into reasoning specialists (Claude, GPT), multimodal leaders (Gemini), and open-source alternatives (Llama, DeepSeek).

Updated 2026-02-0610 sources validated3 claims verified

68.8%

Opus 4.6 ARC-AGI-2 (#1)

Anthropic

$5/$25

Opus 4.6 per 1M tokens

Anthropic

1M

Opus 4.6 context (beta)

Anthropic

8

Frontier models tracked

FrankX Registry

01

Frontier Model Landscape (February 2026)

Eight models define the frontier in early 2026. The landscape is segmented: Anthropic leads reasoning and coding, Google leads multimodal breadth, xAI leads arena rankings, Meta leads open-source, and DeepSeek leads budget reasoning. The gap between frontier and open-source is closing rapidly.

Claude Opus 4.6

#1 Reasoning

#1 ARC-AGI-2 (68.8%), #1 Terminal-Bench (65.4%). 1M context beta, 128K output, $5/$25. The reasoning and coding leader.

GPT-5.2 Pro

Generalist

First 90% ARC-AGI-1, strong multimodal with native audio. $10/$30. The generalist.

Gemini 3 Pro

#1 Multimodal

81% MMMU-Pro, 2M context, native video + audio. $7/$21. The multimodal leader.

Grok 4.1

#1 Arena

#1 LMArena (1483 Elo), 2M context, competitive pricing. The arena champion.

02

Benchmark Comparison

Head-to-head benchmark data validated against official vendor announcements and independent evaluation sources (ARC Prize Foundation, Scale AI SEAL, LMArena, Artificial Analysis). Key benchmarks: ARC-AGI-2 (abstract reasoning), Terminal-Bench (agentic coding), SWE-bench (software engineering), MMMU-Pro (multimodal understanding), OSWorld (computer use).

ARC-AGI-2

Reasoning

Opus 4.6: 68.8% | GPT-5.2: 54.2% | Gemini 3: 45.1% | Opus 4.5: 37.6%

Terminal-Bench 2.0

Coding

Opus 4.6: 65.4% | Opus 4.5: 59.8%

OSWorld

Computer Use

Opus 4.6: 72.7% | Opus 4.5: 66.3%

MMMU-Pro

Multimodal

Gemini 3 Pro: 81.0%

03

Pricing & Economics

The pricing landscape shifted dramatically with Opus 4.6's 67% price cut (from $15/$75 to $5/$25). Opus is now only 1.67x the cost of Sonnet 4.5, changing the routing calculus for production systems. DeepSeek R1 remains the budget leader at $0.55/$2.19 with competitive reasoning. Open-source models (Llama 4 Maverick) are free to self-host.

Best Price/Performance

Best Value

Claude Opus 4.6 at $5/$25 — frontier reasoning at mid-tier pricing

Budget Reasoning

Budget

DeepSeek R1 at $0.55/$2.19 — open-source, MIT license, strong reasoning

Multimodal Value

Multimodal

Gemini 3 Pro at $7/$21 — 2M context with native video + audio

Self-Hosted

Open Source

Llama 4 Maverick — 400B MoE, runs on single H100, no API cost

04

Context Windows & Output Limits

Context window race: Grok 4.1 and Gemini 3 Pro lead at 2M tokens. Opus 4.6 offers 1M in beta. Llama 4 Scout reaches 10M for specialized use. Output limits matter too: Opus 4.6 leads at 128K output tokens (roughly 96K words per response). This enables complete article generation, full code modules, and detailed research reports in single passes.

05

Model Selection Framework

The right model depends on your task. Complex architecture and research → Opus 4.6. Standard coding and content → Sonnet 4.5. High-volume classification → Haiku 4.5. Multimodal with video → Gemini 3 Pro. Budget reasoning → DeepSeek R1. Self-hosted privacy → Llama 4 Maverick. No single model wins every category.

For Creators

Creator

Opus 4.6 for deep work (1M context loads entire content library), Sonnet 4.5 for daily production

For Developers

Developer

Opus 4.6 for architecture + debugging, Sonnet 4.5 for standard coding, Haiku 4.5 for testing

For Enterprise

Enterprise

Opus 4.6 for research synthesis, Sonnet 4.5 for production APIs, Haiku 4.5 for routing + classification

For ACOS

ACOS

Three-tier routing: Haiku (fast/cheap) → Sonnet (balanced) → Opus (complex). Updated to Opus 4.6 with adaptive thinking.

Key Findings

1

Claude Opus 4.6 leads ARC-AGI-2 at 68.8%, a 31.2 percentage point jump from Opus 4.5 (37.6%)

2

Opus 4.6 pricing dropped 67% ($15/$75 → $5/$25), now only 1.67x the cost of Sonnet 4.5

3

1M token context (beta) enables loading entire codebases and content libraries in single sessions

4

128K output tokens (2x previous) enables complete long-form content in single generation passes

5

Adaptive thinking replaces manual budget_tokens, auto-calibrating reasoning depth per query

6

Grok 4.1 and Gemini 3 Pro lead on raw context at 2M tokens; Gemini leads multimodal breadth

7

DeepSeek R1 remains the budget reasoning champion at $0.55/$2.19 (MIT license, open-source)

8

Open-source gap closing: Llama 4 Maverick (400B MoE) matches dense models at fraction of compute

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4.6 leads reasoning benchmarks with 68.8% on ARC-AGI-2 and 65.4% on Terminal-Bench as of February 2026.

Sources & References

10 validated sources · Last updated 2026-02-06