Frontier AI Models & Generative Intelligence
Benchmarks, pricing, capabilities, and what to use when
Claude Opus 4.6 leads ARC-AGI-2 (68.8%) and Terminal-Bench (65.4%) as of February 2026. Its 67% price cut to $5/$25 makes it competitive with mid-tier models. Grok 4.1 and Gemini 3 Pro lead on context (2M). The market is splitting into reasoning specialists (Claude, GPT), multimodal leaders (Gemini), and open-source alternatives (Llama, DeepSeek).
8
Frontier models tracked
FrankX Registry
Frontier Model Landscape (February 2026)
Eight models define the frontier in early 2026. The landscape is segmented: Anthropic leads reasoning and coding, Google leads multimodal breadth, xAI leads arena rankings, Meta leads open-source, and DeepSeek leads budget reasoning. The gap between frontier and open-source is closing rapidly.
Claude Opus 4.6
#1 Reasoning#1 ARC-AGI-2 (68.8%), #1 Terminal-Bench (65.4%). 1M context beta, 128K output, $5/$25. The reasoning and coding leader.
GPT-5.2 Pro
GeneralistFirst 90% ARC-AGI-1, strong multimodal with native audio. $10/$30. The generalist.
Gemini 3 Pro
#1 Multimodal81% MMMU-Pro, 2M context, native video + audio. $7/$21. The multimodal leader.
Grok 4.1
#1 Arena#1 LMArena (1483 Elo), 2M context, competitive pricing. The arena champion.
Benchmark Comparison
Head-to-head benchmark data validated against official vendor announcements and independent evaluation sources (ARC Prize Foundation, Scale AI SEAL, LMArena, Artificial Analysis). Key benchmarks: ARC-AGI-2 (abstract reasoning), Terminal-Bench (agentic coding), SWE-bench (software engineering), MMMU-Pro (multimodal understanding), OSWorld (computer use).
ARC-AGI-2
ReasoningOpus 4.6: 68.8% | GPT-5.2: 54.2% | Gemini 3: 45.1% | Opus 4.5: 37.6%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
CodingOpus 4.6: 65.4% | Opus 4.5: 59.8%
OSWorld
Computer UseOpus 4.6: 72.7% | Opus 4.5: 66.3%
MMMU-Pro
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro: 81.0%
Pricing & Economics
The pricing landscape shifted dramatically with Opus 4.6's 67% price cut (from $15/$75 to $5/$25). Opus is now only 1.67x the cost of Sonnet 4.5, changing the routing calculus for production systems. DeepSeek R1 remains the budget leader at $0.55/$2.19 with competitive reasoning. Open-source models (Llama 4 Maverick) are free to self-host.
Best Price/Performance
Best ValueClaude Opus 4.6 at $5/$25 — frontier reasoning at mid-tier pricing
Budget Reasoning
BudgetDeepSeek R1 at $0.55/$2.19 — open-source, MIT license, strong reasoning
Multimodal Value
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro at $7/$21 — 2M context with native video + audio
Self-Hosted
Open SourceLlama 4 Maverick — 400B MoE, runs on single H100, no API cost
Context Windows & Output Limits
Context window race: Grok 4.1 and Gemini 3 Pro lead at 2M tokens. Opus 4.6 offers 1M in beta. Llama 4 Scout reaches 10M for specialized use. Output limits matter too: Opus 4.6 leads at 128K output tokens (roughly 96K words per response). This enables complete article generation, full code modules, and detailed research reports in single passes.
Model Selection Framework
The right model depends on your task. Complex architecture and research → Opus 4.6. Standard coding and content → Sonnet 4.5. High-volume classification → Haiku 4.5. Multimodal with video → Gemini 3 Pro. Budget reasoning → DeepSeek R1. Self-hosted privacy → Llama 4 Maverick. No single model wins every category.
For Creators
CreatorOpus 4.6 for deep work (1M context loads entire content library), Sonnet 4.5 for daily production
For Developers
DeveloperOpus 4.6 for architecture + debugging, Sonnet 4.5 for standard coding, Haiku 4.5 for testing
For Enterprise
EnterpriseOpus 4.6 for research synthesis, Sonnet 4.5 for production APIs, Haiku 4.5 for routing + classification
For ACOS
ACOSThree-tier routing: Haiku (fast/cheap) → Sonnet (balanced) → Opus (complex). Updated to Opus 4.6 with adaptive thinking.
Key Findings
Claude Opus 4.6 leads ARC-AGI-2 at 68.8%, a 31.2 percentage point jump from Opus 4.5 (37.6%)
Opus 4.6 pricing dropped 67% ($15/$75 → $5/$25), now only 1.67x the cost of Sonnet 4.5
1M token context (beta) enables loading entire codebases and content libraries in single sessions
128K output tokens (2x previous) enables complete long-form content in single generation passes
Adaptive thinking replaces manual budget_tokens, auto-calibrating reasoning depth per query
Grok 4.1 and Gemini 3 Pro lead on raw context at 2M tokens; Gemini leads multimodal breadth
DeepSeek R1 remains the budget reasoning champion at $0.55/$2.19 (MIT license, open-source)
Open-source gap closing: Llama 4 Maverick (400B MoE) matches dense models at fraction of compute
Frequently Asked Questions
Claude Opus 4.6 leads reasoning benchmarks with 68.8% on ARC-AGI-2 and 65.4% on Terminal-Bench as of February 2026.
Sources & References
10 validated sources · Last updated 2026-02-06